How To Be Really Good

Research shows that most people think of themselves as nice people (see for example, 'People think they're nicer than they actually are', Rachel Hosie, Independent, 13.3.17). What they seem to mean b by this is that they do little things to help people, such as give up a seat on a train. This is what many people probably think being a 'good person' involves - doing good things. However, the same people admit that very often they do not help if it involves a more significant sacrifice. So, if they think of themselves as good, and they think of being good as doing good things, they realise that they are not as good as they could be. They are quite good but they could be a lot better.
Peter Singer has argued that if we see being good as doing good things, and if we really want to be good, then we have a moral obligation to help others up to the point where if we help them any more we would make ourselves worse off than they are (see for example, 'Famine, Affluence and Morality', 1972). Singer admit that not many people would live like this, and in later writings he has played this obligation down, suggesting that people who want to be good should only give up to 25% of their wealth to those less well off. But it's clear that, deep down, he thinks the more demanding principle holds as a moral requirement.
Loveless Goodness
Singer's view is based on his Utilitarian approach to morality. In Utilitarianism actions are judged morally good in so far as they promote the greatest happiness of the greatest number of people. Therefore the best action is the one that promotes the best consequences in this sense. Singer at his most demanding exhorts people to do the most good they can do.
この記事は Philosophy Now の August/September 2022 版に掲載されています。
7 日間の Magzter GOLD 無料トライアルを開始して、何千もの厳選されたプレミアム ストーリー、9,500 以上の雑誌や新聞にアクセスしてください。
すでに購読者です ? サインイン
この記事は Philosophy Now の August/September 2022 版に掲載されています。
7 日間の Magzter GOLD 無料トライアルを開始して、何千もの厳選されたプレミアム ストーリー、9,500 以上の雑誌や新聞にアクセスしてください。
すでに購読者です? サインイン

Affirmative Action for Androids
Jimmy Alfonso Licon asks, when should we prioritise android rights?

Welcome to the Civilization of the Liar's Paradox
Slavoj Žižek uncovers political paradoxes of lying.

The Importance of the Purple
Massimo Pigliucci looks for threads of integrity in a morally compromised world.

Ethics for the Age of AI
Mahmoud Khatami asks, can machines make good moral decisions?

Anand Vaidya (1976-2024)
Manjula Menon on the short but full career of a 'disciplinary trespasser'.

Studying Smarter with AI?
Max Gottschlich on sense and nonsense when using AI in academia.

Excusing God
Raymond Tallis highlights the problem of evil.

Stephen Fry
Perhaps unshockingly for someone who is an actor, broadcaster, comedian, director, narrator and writer, Stephen Fry has a deep interest in words and how we use them. After hearing him lecture on that subject, Marcel Steinbauer-Lewis asked him about Artificial Intelligence and how it connects with the extraordinary lure of language.

Is VR Meaningful Escapism?
Amir Haj-Bolouri enquires into possible meaning through technology.

What Simone de Beauvoir Got — And Didn't Get – About Motherhood
Nura Hossainzadeh argues that motherhood is both physical and transcendent.