The reason for this was the publication of her thesis, Speculum of the Other Woman (1974), a radical critique of the use of the feminine in psychoanalysis, and a deconstruction of the very foundations of our culture. According to Irigaray, our culture is built around the idea of a 'neutral subject'; but this idea is fictitious: the reality is what she calls 'sexuate belonging' and 'sexuate difference'. This says there are two subjectivities, masculine and feminine, and also a culture of 'between two'; as opposed to the idea of a universal human subject who in practice is male.
The immediate scandal of the publication was commensurate with the book's success: Irigaray was cast away from Vincennes University and the École Freudienne de Paris. Later she was prevented from publishing anything. Already exiled from her birth country, Belgium, and from her coal-miner family, the young woman faced intellectual rejection in her new homeland. She and her ideas took refuge abroad; in Italy where she worked alongside the Communist party for years; and in the United States, where she became a fundamental reference for gender studies and feminist theory. Her deep ecological conviction was born out of 'a respect for nature', which is also at the heart of her differentialist approach to gender. Reluctant to look back on the controversies she's had to face, she tirelessly endeavours to 'create something positive for the present and the future' instead of dwelling on negatives.
Her latest work, The Mediation of Touch, explores the role of touch as living mediation in relating to oneself, to the other(s) and to the world. It develops the idea that touch entails communing with other living beings rather than seizing hold of them as quasi-objects; and suggests that touch can ensure a sensitive mediation between individuals in a culture of transcendental difference(s).
ãã®èšäºã¯ Philosophy Now ã® June/July 2024 çã«æ²èŒãããŠããŸãã
7 æ¥éã® Magzter GOLD ç¡æãã©ã€ã¢ã«ãéå§ããŠãäœåãã®å³éžããããã¬ãã¢ã ã¹ããŒãªãŒã9,000 以äžã®éèªãæ°èã«ã¢ã¯ã»ã¹ããŠãã ããã
ãã§ã«è³Œèªè ã§ã ?  ãµã€ã³ã€ã³
ãã®èšäºã¯ Philosophy Now ã® June/July 2024 çã«æ²èŒãããŠããŸãã
7 æ¥éã® Magzter GOLD ç¡æãã©ã€ã¢ã«ãéå§ããŠãäœåãã®å³éžããããã¬ãã¢ã ã¹ããŒãªãŒã9,000 以äžã®éèªãæ°èã«ã¢ã¯ã»ã¹ããŠãã ããã
ãã§ã«è³Œèªè ã§ã? ãµã€ã³ã€ã³
Anselm (1033-1109)
Martin Jenkins recalls the being of the creator of the ontological argument.
Is Brillo Box an Illustration?
Thomas E. Wartenberg uses Warhol's work to illustrate his theory of illustration.
Why is Freedom So Important To Us?
John Shand explains why free will is basic to humanity.
The Funnel of Righteousness
Peter Worley tells us how to be right, righter, rightest.
We're as Smart as the Universe Gets
James Miles argues, among other things, that E.T. will be like Kim Kardashian, and that the real threat of advanced AI has been misunderstood.
Managing the Mind
Roger Haines contemplates how we consciously manage our minds.
lain McGilchrist's Naturalized Metaphysics
Rogério Severo looks at the brain to see the world anew.
Love & Metaphysics
Peter Graarup Westergaard explains why love is never just physical, with the aid of Donald Davidson's anomalous monism.
Mary Leaves Her Room
Nigel Hems asks, does Mary see colours differently outside her room?
From Birds To Brains
Jonathan Moens considers whether emergence can explain minds from brains.