In September last year, when journalist Radhika Iyengar's book Fire On The Ganges was published, she took to social media to acknowledge those who helped shape her work. Among the three editors she thanked in the post was Shalin Maria Lawrence, her sensitivity editor. Fire On The Ganges is about the lives of Doms, a sub-caste of Dalits who traditionally performed Hindu cremation rites in Varanasi.
Despite her years of reporting, Iyengar says she sought a sensitivity editor, "another set of eyes to read her work", since she was writing about a marginalised community.
In essence, a sensitivity editor whose qualifications boil down to lived experience combined with domain knowledgeis requested to read a manuscript and suggest changes on problematic representations with regard to caste, class, race, ethnicity, gender or sexuality. It's usually a freelance gig, with the publisher engaging the editor on a case-by-case basis, and it is often unpaid in India, while remuneration is fixed abroad.
A fellow journalist recommended Lawrence to Iyengar and the two spoke a few times before deciding they could work together since it is imperative that the "sensitivity editor understands the project and your intentions," says Iyengar, who describes Lawrence as "a respected, powerful voice... an established author and a Dalit rights activist", and ideal for the role.
Iyengar says she was "acutely cognisant" of her position of power relative to the community about which she was writing: "I am aware that no amount of research and storytelling can replace lived Dalit experiences but as a journalist, it's my responsibility to tell their stories with sincerity and honesty," she says.
At the heart of requesting sensitivity checks is the acknowledgement of vastly different lived experiences. An editor who steps in to do this will end up easing two insecurities: of misappropriation and of misrepresentation.
この記事は Mint Mumbai の February 17, 2024 版に掲載されています。
7 日間の Magzter GOLD 無料トライアルを開始して、何千もの厳選されたプレミアム ストーリー、9,000 以上の雑誌や新聞にアクセスしてください。
すでに購読者です ? サインイン
この記事は Mint Mumbai の February 17, 2024 版に掲載されています。
7 日間の Magzter GOLD 無料トライアルを開始して、何千もの厳選されたプレミアム ストーリー、9,000 以上の雑誌や新聞にアクセスしてください。
すでに購読者です? サインイン
Buying Online? Beware Of these deceptive patterns
Deceptive prompts in apps—ways to coerce people into spending more time or money—are on the rise. Here's how to identify them
As AI gets real, slow and steady wins the race
Companies head into 2025 with careful deliberation when it comes to using AI
Why the Earth Is Not a Type 1 Technological Civilization
According to one theory about how we harness energy, Type 1s have total control over planetary energy resources
Our legislative frameworks must adapt to the rise of AI
Probabilistic digital systems complicate guilt assignment but we'll need tight controls against major harms
Take tax action for Viksit Bharat in the Union budget for 2025-26
The government could take major steps towards its worthy goal of a tax regime that's simple, predictable and competitive
Trump's US mustn't repeat its profiling of Chinese scientists
Espionage suspicions could lead the US to lose its war for talent
The rise of Trump poses a paradox of higher education
An elitist college system seems to have deepened divisions in the US and this may hold lessons for India too
There's a case for heavy taxes on MNC royalties
Royalty payments to MNCs by their local units have been rising-even going above dividend payouts in some cases. India needs shareholder vigilance and fiscal action to curb excesses
Financial frauds evolve fast but we can still safeguard ourselves
While technology has transformed how scamsters operate, reliable ways exist to dodge their traps
Smart-beta funds: A guide to balancing your portfolio
Tailor-made strategies will help you navigate the market cycles better and optimize returns