SC CLEARS DECKS FOR LARGEST TAKEOVER UNDER IBC
Legal Era|December 2019
On 15 November, 2019, the apex court held that the CIRP of ESIL will take place in accordance with the RP of Arcelor Mittal, as amended and accepted by the CoC, as it has provided for amounts to be paid to different classes of creditors by following Section 30(2) and Regulation 38 of the CIRP Regulations
Madhavi Gokhlay
SC CLEARS DECKS FOR LARGEST TAKEOVER UNDER IBC

In a landmark ruling, the Supreme Court on 15 November, 2019, in the matter of the Committee of Creditors (CoC) of Essar Steel India Limited (ESIL) versus Satish Kumar & Others, set aside the 4 July, 2019 National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) or Appellate Tribunal order, and cleared the decks for takeover of ESIL by leading integrated steel and mining major, Arcelor Mittal.

Not only did the apex court pave the way for the largest takeover of bad debt under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (Code), it also settled several issues pertaining to the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) under the Code, as follows:

One, it is the responsibility of the Resolution Professional (RP) to manage the affairs of the corporate debtor (CD) as a going concern during the CIRP.

Two, insolvency resolution is ultimately in the hands of the CoC, which may approve the resolution plan (RP) of a prospective resolution applicant by a majority vote after considering its feasibility and viability among other requirements. The feasibility and viability of the resolution plan is left to the majority decision of the CoC, which obviously takes into account all aspects of the plan, including the manner of distribution of funds among various classes of creditors. In reinstating the CoC as the main decision-maker and driver of the CIRP, the Supreme Court upheld the government amendment to the Code earlier this year. However, it clarified that the CoC does not act in any fiduciary capacity to any group of creditors. Rather, a business decision based on ground realities is to be taken by the requisite majority, which is then binding on all stakeholders including dissenting creditors.

Denne historien er fra December 2019-utgaven av Legal Era.

Start din 7-dagers gratis prøveperiode på Magzter GOLD for å få tilgang til tusenvis av utvalgte premiumhistorier og 9000+ magasiner og aviser.

Denne historien er fra December 2019-utgaven av Legal Era.

Start din 7-dagers gratis prøveperiode på Magzter GOLD for å få tilgang til tusenvis av utvalgte premiumhistorier og 9000+ magasiner og aviser.

FLERE HISTORIER FRA LEGAL ERASe alt
If You Think Positive Covid Is A Big Opportunity
Legal Era

If You Think Positive Covid Is A Big Opportunity

Senior Vice President and Head of Legal, ESSAR CAPITAL, Badrinath Durvasula, holds forth on his professional journey, the essence of leadership, working from home, books and more…

time-read
10+ mins  |
December 2020
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT
Legal Era

PROJECT DEVELOPMENT

JOINT VENTURE TRANSACTIONS

time-read
10+ mins  |
December 2020
NEW ARBITRATION RULES
Legal Era

NEW ARBITRATION RULES

PUBLISHED BY THE LONDON COURT OF INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION (LCIA) AND INTERNATIONAL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE (ICC)

time-read
6 mins  |
December 2020
M&A in the time of COVID and beyond
Legal Era

M&A in the time of COVID and beyond

What is clear for those engaging in cross-border M&A is that countries around the world are becoming increasingly protective of their economies and industries, with new rules being introduced and existing rules being more widely applied

time-read
6 mins  |
December 2020
SWITZERLAND A DIFFERENTIATED APPROACH TO FRAUD
Legal Era

SWITZERLAND A DIFFERENTIATED APPROACH TO FRAUD

Swiss law interprets the offense of fraud in a special way where in addition to the characteristics of deception and damage as known in many jurisdictions, a qualified lie, i.e. a malicious approach, is required

time-read
5 mins  |
December 2020
JOINT VENTURE DISPUTES MEDIATING
Legal Era

JOINT VENTURE DISPUTES MEDIATING

Mediation has shown itself to be a powerful tool for bringing a speedy and effective end to crossborder disputes while preserving the commercial relationship between them.

time-read
7 mins  |
December 2020
Recognition of HONG KONG INSOLVENCY PROCEEDINGS IN MAINLAND CHINA
Legal Era

Recognition of HONG KONG INSOLVENCY PROCEEDINGS IN MAINLAND CHINA

A TEST CASE IN THE MAKING?

time-read
8 mins  |
December 2020
CONFIDENTIALITY IN ARBITRATION: RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN SINGAPORE
Legal Era

CONFIDENTIALITY IN ARBITRATION: RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN SINGAPORE

Two recent developments in Singapore case law and legislation reflect a willingness to preserve confidentiality related obligations in all arbitrations

time-read
5 mins  |
December 2020
ESSENTIAL GOODS SERVICES UNDER IBC
Legal Era

ESSENTIAL GOODS SERVICES UNDER IBC

WHAT DOES IT ESSENTIALLY MEAN?

time-read
6 mins  |
December 2020
A BIDEN ADMINISTRATION'S NEW VISION FOR THE AMERICAN WORKPLACE
Legal Era

A BIDEN ADMINISTRATION'S NEW VISION FOR THE AMERICAN WORKPLACE

A LOOK AT THE KEY CHANGES PRESIDENT-ELECT BIDEN IS LIKELY TO MAKE ONCE HE TAKES OFFICE

time-read
7 mins  |
December 2020