Prøve GULL - Gratis
West World
Philosophy Now
|June/July 2017
Leo Cookman performs an Unheimlich manoeuvre to review a disturbing android saga.
Uncanny is a word with which we’re all familiar, but perhaps slightly misunderstand. We often say that when something or someone is similar to another something or someone, the resemblance is ‘uncanny’, especially if it is one person doing an impression of another. In many ways this is accurate, but it’s normally used in a positive way in this instance. “It’s uncanny!” we may say in wonder. However, when something is truly uncanny there are few things more unsettling.
The concept of ‘the uncanny’ has been explored for centuries, but it was popularised by Ernst Jentsch in his essay On the Psychology of the Uncanny (1906) and Sigmund Freud in Das Unheimliche [The Uncanny] (1919). It is the idea of something that is familiar but just outside the realms of being the same. The etymology of the word ‘uncanny’ stems from the AngloSaxon ken (still used in the Scots dialect) meaning ‘understanding or knowledge’; thus ‘uncanny’ is ‘outside of understanding’. Essentially it is something we do not quite understand.
We all know the feeling of the uncanny when someone or something is not quite right. People have reported feeling this in the presence of psychopaths who act in a socially acceptable manner but whom they can instinctively tell are pretending. The disjunct is unsettling. This aligns with an idea that our sense of the uncanny may have evolved in order to help us avoid dangers revealed by that which is ‘not quite right’, including selecting better mates. It’s posited that this also ties in with our dislike of seeing a cadaver; something that looks human but which has no life inside it.
Denne historien er fra June/July 2017-utgaven av Philosophy Now.
Abonner på Magzter GOLD for å få tilgang til tusenvis av kuraterte premiumhistorier og over 9000 magasiner og aviser.
Allerede abonnent? Logg på
FLERE HISTORIER FRA Philosophy Now
Philosophy Now
Nosferatu
Stefan Bolea considers two very different artistic approaches to love and death.
6 mins
April/May 2025
Philosophy Now
Heidegger's Ghost
Raymond Tallis wonders where Heidegger's body went when he was philosophising.
7 mins
April/May 2025
Philosophy Now
Is Comedy Good For Us?
Damaris Stock has a laugh with Plato and friends.
10 mins
April/May 2025
Philosophy Now
In Defense of Idleness
Wendell O'Brien says, 'Just Don't Do It'.
10 mins
April/May 2025
Philosophy Now
Leaving Nothing to Chance by Carl Knight
LEAVING NOTHING TO Chance (2025) by Carl Knight, is an informed, proficient and lucid defence of luck egalitarianism.
3 mins
April/May 2025
Philosophy Now
Star Maker by Olaf Stapledon
THE 1937 SCIENCE FICTION novel Star Maker was written by philosophy professor Olaf Stapledon in the dark days as Europe awaited the onslaught of Nazi Germany. This casts a shadow over the whole book.
6 mins
April/May 2025
Philosophy Now
Love & Emptiness in the Sufi Tradition
Medha Ninad Tambe meditates on Rumi, love and self-negation.
7 mins
April/May 2025
Philosophy Now
The Hedgehog's Dilemma: A Metaphor About the Challenges of Human Intimacy
Krishna Chaubey explains Arthur Schopenhauer's poignant thought experiment.
4 mins
April/May 2025
Philosophy Now
The Mirror & the Flame
Rebwar Fatah imagines Attar's & Hegel's shared path.
4 mins
April/May 2025
Philosophy Now
Free and Equal by Daniel Chandler
DANIEL CHANDLER, AN economist and philosopher based at the London School of Economics, begins Free and Equal: What Would a Fair Society Look Like? (2023) by asking an intriguing question. How is it, he wonders, that the most influential political philosopher of the last century has had almost no practical impact on politics or policy? The philosopher in question is John Rawls, whose magnum opus was A Theory of Justice (1971).
5 mins
April/May 2025
Translate
Change font size
