Prøve GULL - Gratis
Seeing Through Transparency
Philosophy Now
|October/November 2023
Paul Doolan clearly sees transparency through philosophy.
Chances are you're too young to remember Carly Simon's tune 'No Secrets' from her 1972 album No Secrets, in which she sings to her lover "We have no secrets, we tell each other everything." However, telling everything - all those past lovers, all those hidden fantasies - may not be the best recipe for a healthy relationship. The song's refrain ends, "Sometimes I wish... that I never knew, some of those secrets of yours." Perhaps we are in danger of discarding this wisdom, in a society where everything that is hidden is looked upon with suspicion, and transparency is hyped as a great virtue.
We are frequently assaulted by calls for transparency. A quick Google search on the need for transparency' delivers lists of reasons why more transparency is needed, especially in business, politics, and education. I am sure many readers recognise the boss calling for a process of transparency'. Yet philosophical inquiry will reveal that transparency intrudes upon privacy, kills spontaneity, and robs the individual of interiority. In the Age of Transparency, interiority, secrecy, and Hermetic hiddenness are forms of resistance.
Hypervisibility
Calls for 'transparency' betray an optical preference - a hidden assumption that the only knowledge that is worthwhile is knowledge for which the evidence can be seen. This can be summed up in the expression 'Seeing is believing'. Other ways of knowing become secondary. Walter Benjamin further pointed out that the Scientific Revolution of Copernicus and Galileo set us on a course leading to an "optical connection to the universe" (One Way Street and Other Writings, 1979, p.111). And we talk about 'eye-witnesses', even when the witnesses relate testimony that was only ever heard, never seen.
Denne historien er fra October/November 2023-utgaven av Philosophy Now.
Abonner på Magzter GOLD for å få tilgang til tusenvis av kuraterte premiumhistorier og over 9000 magasiner og aviser.
Allerede abonnent? Logg på
FLERE HISTORIER FRA Philosophy Now
Philosophy Now
Nosferatu
Stefan Bolea considers two very different artistic approaches to love and death.
6 mins
April/May 2025
Philosophy Now
Heidegger's Ghost
Raymond Tallis wonders where Heidegger's body went when he was philosophising.
7 mins
April/May 2025
Philosophy Now
Is Comedy Good For Us?
Damaris Stock has a laugh with Plato and friends.
10 mins
April/May 2025
Philosophy Now
In Defense of Idleness
Wendell O'Brien says, 'Just Don't Do It'.
10 mins
April/May 2025
Philosophy Now
Leaving Nothing to Chance by Carl Knight
LEAVING NOTHING TO Chance (2025) by Carl Knight, is an informed, proficient and lucid defence of luck egalitarianism.
3 mins
April/May 2025
Philosophy Now
Star Maker by Olaf Stapledon
THE 1937 SCIENCE FICTION novel Star Maker was written by philosophy professor Olaf Stapledon in the dark days as Europe awaited the onslaught of Nazi Germany. This casts a shadow over the whole book.
6 mins
April/May 2025
Philosophy Now
Love & Emptiness in the Sufi Tradition
Medha Ninad Tambe meditates on Rumi, love and self-negation.
7 mins
April/May 2025
Philosophy Now
The Hedgehog's Dilemma: A Metaphor About the Challenges of Human Intimacy
Krishna Chaubey explains Arthur Schopenhauer's poignant thought experiment.
4 mins
April/May 2025
Philosophy Now
The Mirror & the Flame
Rebwar Fatah imagines Attar's & Hegel's shared path.
4 mins
April/May 2025
Philosophy Now
Free and Equal by Daniel Chandler
DANIEL CHANDLER, AN economist and philosopher based at the London School of Economics, begins Free and Equal: What Would a Fair Society Look Like? (2023) by asking an intriguing question. How is it, he wonders, that the most influential political philosopher of the last century has had almost no practical impact on politics or policy? The philosopher in question is John Rawls, whose magnum opus was A Theory of Justice (1971).
5 mins
April/May 2025
Translate
Change font size

