This important intervention by the apex Court is based on understanding how the power of words influences society in general and various fields, especially the legal field. In the preface of the book, the Hon'ble Chief Justice of the Supreme Court states that this handbook is intended for the legal community to understand and respond to gender-based misconceptions. The Supreme Court has also directed that harmful gender-based misconceptions should not be used in judicial pronouncements and legal drafting.
The handbook released by the Supreme Court contains a large collection of words and phrases currently used and new words and phrases suggested for use.
It recommends a change in the words used in the judicial system and suggests new words to be used in drafting, court judgments, and arguments. Further, the top court instructs that such words should not only be avoided when making judgments in court but also that they should be responded to and corrected. Reliance on such misconceptions will prevent justice from being served. Judges should try to understand and avoid such misconceptions.
The Gender-based misconceptions lead to various forms of denial of justice.
The court's effort is to form a view based on equality, without evaluating facts separated by gender differences. The same court itself has pointed out many previous judgments and directed that gender-based misconceptions should not occur anymore.
The handbook provides two lists of words and phrases currently used and new ones to be used. It instructs not to use the old ones anymore. A large collection of words is presented here, through which the Supreme Court itself recommends using new words, avoiding words that are misused in the legal field that reflect male dominance and anti-women sentiments.
This calls for a change in the legal field itself.
Denne historien er fra October 13, 2024-utgaven av The Business Guardian.
Start din 7-dagers gratis prøveperiode på Magzter GOLD for å få tilgang til tusenvis av utvalgte premiumhistorier og 9000+ magasiner og aviser.
Allerede abonnent ? Logg på
Denne historien er fra October 13, 2024-utgaven av The Business Guardian.
Start din 7-dagers gratis prøveperiode på Magzter GOLD for å få tilgang til tusenvis av utvalgte premiumhistorier og 9000+ magasiner og aviser.
Allerede abonnent? Logg på
Fitness Influencers Rohit Dalal, Akshay Dilawari Join AAP
Fitness influencers, Rohit Dalal and Akshay Dilawari, known for their work in the sports and fitness industry, joined the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) on Thursday.
AAP Keeps Giving Strange Statements to Be in News: BJP
After the Aam Admi Party (AAP) accused Congress of \"speaking the BJP language\", Bharatiya Janata Party MP Sudhanshu Trivedi on Thursday took a dig at the AAP, saying that they make such strange statements to remain in the news, adding that their statement is an admission of their defeat in the Delhi elections.
Cong Accuses Kejriwal of Shifting Blame as AAP's Credibility Collapses
The Delhi unit of Congress claims that the fear of losing the upcoming assembly elections is now haunting Arvind Kejriwal.
NDMC Passes Resolution Condemning Delhi Govt's Schemes
The New Delhi Municipal Corporation (NDMC) on Thursday passed a resolution condemning the AAP-led Delhi government's 'Mukhya Mantri Mahila Samman Yojna' and 'Sanjeevani Yojna'.
Sandeep Dikshit complains to LG against AAP's 'Mahila Samman' scheme
Congress's complaint comes a day after a couple of departments under the Delhi government clarified there is no such scheme and distanced themselves from AAP's promises.
CASH FOR VOTES: AAP MOVES TO ED
Sanjay Singh lodged a complaint with ED against Parvesh Verma, Manjinder Singh Sirsa for allegedly distributing cash to voters.
![Kerala High Court: Quashing Of Serious Offence To Efface Evidence Already Recorded Cannot Be Done Even At Instance Of Survivor [POSCO Act]](https://reseuro.magzter.com/100x125/articles/26854/1941485/3Dir29po62bcaaKmtxZsys/KERALA-HIGH-COURT-QUASHING-OF-SERIOUS-OFFENCE-TO-EFFACE-EVIDENCE-ALREADY-RECORDED-CANNOT-BE-DONE-EVEN-AT-INSTANCE-OF-SURVIVOR-POSCO-ACT.jpg "Kerala High Court: Quashing Of Serious Offence To Efface Evidence Already Recorded Cannot Be Done Even At Instance Of Survivor [POSCO Act]")
Kerala High Court: Quashing Of Serious Offence To Efface Evidence Already Recorded Cannot Be Done Even At Instance Of Survivor [POSCO Act]
The Kerala High Court in the case xxx v State and Another observed and has dismissed the petition filed by a victim of POCSO offence to quash the proceedings saying that serious offences are involved and the trial had reached at the end stage.
Punjab And Haryana High Court: POSCO Act Being Enacted Subsequently Will Prevail Over SC/ST Act In
Adding to it, the court stated that when there being a conflict between the provisions of two special enactments, it is trite that the provisions of the latter of the two enactments will prevail and since the POCSO Act is a subsequent enactment, therefore, its provisions will prevail over the SC/ST Act.
Madras High Court Grants Interim Bail To Temple Activist, Asks Him To Refrain From Making Objectionable Comments Against Women
The Madras High Court in the case Rangarajan Narasimhan v State of Tamil Nadu observed and has granted bail to temple activist Rangarajan Narasimham for allegedly making derogatory comments against a woman on social media.
Orissa High Court: Dispute Related To Infringement Of Copyright Is Arbitrable, Arbitrator Can Be Appointed Under Section 11 Of Arbitration Act
The Other party opposed the application which being on the ground that the dispute as evident from the petitioner's notice seeking the appointment of an Arbitrator regards to infringement of copyright which is non-arbitrable.
