Could euphoria over win be a problem for Trump?

November 6 marks the beginning of a momentous chapter in American history, not only as the date when Donald Trump was elected as the 47th President of the United States but also as a symbol of a new era characterized by a resurgence of American glory and pre-eminence.

- GOURI SANKAR NAG AND MANAS MUKUL BANDYOPADHYAY

Although such an overwhelming victory could not be forecast before, the widespread euphoria that the election outcome exudes signifies a discernible shift in the political landscape, where Trump's persona seems to have re-emerged as a beacon of hope for many, particularly those disillusioned by both internal discomfiture and ongoing global crises intensified by Biden's shaky conduct.

Although it would be too early to say this, the implications of Trump's new inning undoubtedly extend beyond domestic borders, resonating with hope for a battered humanity across the globe, whether war-ravaged Eastern Europe or regions like the Middle East, where conflict has spilt over into broader supply-chain and security disasters.

For marginalized communities, including Black and Asian populations within the U.S., Trump's election represents an opportunity to get their voice heard, positioning him as a potential pivot for bold change both at home and abroad.

But how will a new administration under Trump respond to the pressure of huge expectations – the demand already built up by his pledges?

While the mandate favouring Trump is compelling and irrefutable, it is essential to analyze his leadership style critically.

Unlike the model of statesmanship exemplified by thinkers like John Stuart Mill, who advocated for rational discourse and representative governance, Trump embodies a more impulsive approach.

As noted by Sashi Tharoor, he is akin to "an open book" – a leader who articulates his thoughts candidly but often without the restraint associated with the conventional decorum of formalities.

His communication style can be described as spontaneous and at times hysterical, which raises questions about his astuteness, not to speak of dexterity, in navigating complex international relations.