This 1931 case is a landmark judgement highlighting the constitutional protection given to the freedom of the press.
In this case, the County Attorney of Hennepin County brought an action against “The Saturday Press,” published by the Defendants in the city of Minneapolis. The Complainant alleged that the Defendants published and circulated editions of the above-named periodical which were largely devoted to “malicious, scandalous and defamatory articles” concerning Charles G. Davis, a Special Law Enforcement Officer employed by a civic organization, Frank W. Brunskill, who was the Chief of Police, the Minneapolis Tribune, the Minneapolis Journal, Melvin C. Passolt, George E. Leach, who was Mayor of Minneapolis, the Jewish race, the Members of the Grand Jury of Hennepin County then holding office, Floyd B. Olson (the relator in this action), who was County Attorney, and other persons.
Chief Justice Hughes delivered the opinion of the Court, stating therein that the articles charged in substance that a Jewish gangster was in control of gambling, bootlegging and racketeering in Minneapolis, and that law enforcing officers and agencies were not performing their duty up to the mark. Most of the charges were directed against the Chief of Police, who was charged with gross neglect of duty, having illicit relations with the gangsters, and with participation in graft. The County Attorney was charged with being fully aware of the same situation and not taking adequate measures to snub them. The Mayor was accused of inefficiency and dereliction. It was stated in the complaint that one member of the Grand Jury had sympathy with the gangsters.
Bu hikaye LawZ Magazine dergisinin February 2018 sayısından alınmıştır.
Start your 7-day Magzter GOLD free trial to access thousands of curated premium stories, and 9,000+ magazines and newspapers.
Already a subscriber ? Giriş Yap
Bu hikaye LawZ Magazine dergisinin February 2018 sayısından alınmıştır.
Start your 7-day Magzter GOLD free trial to access thousands of curated premium stories, and 9,000+ magazines and newspapers.
Already a subscriber? Giriş Yap
Freedom Of The Press: Print Media Near -Vs- Minnesota
This 1931 case is a landmark judgement highlighting the constitutional protection given to the freedom of the press.
Protection To Woman
Well, the Indian Penal code, acts as a sword as well as a shield for the Indian women.
Corporate Governance Past, Present & Future In India
While corporate governance may not dictate the economic prospects of developing countries, it certainly plays an integral role in shaping them. Corporate governance deals with the rights and responsibilities of a company’s management, its board, shareholders and various stakeholders.
Builders Can't Force Buyers To Go For Arbitration
It is a well settled law that arbitration agreements do not bar the jurisdiction of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (‘NCDRC’) and other consumer forums. The issue was, however, reconsidered at length by a Full Bench of the NCDRC, in Aftab Singh v Emaar MGF Land Limited &Anr [Consumer Case No 701 of 2015] in view of the amendments to the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 (‘the Amended Act’).
The Unwanted Acid
Incidents of acid attacks in which the perpetrator throws acid at the face of the victim are on rise. Such acid violence have a specific gender dimension in India as a majority of reported victims have been women. While acid attacks constitute only a fraction of the total number of violent incidents against women, they are among the most horrific examples of brutality inflicted on women.
Iran Deal Withdrawal
WORST DEAL OR WORST MISTAKE
Law Regulating
ELECTIONS IN INDIA
Karl Marx
Karl Marx has been without doubt one of the most influential socialist thinkers till date. Although he was largely ignored by scholars, his social, economic and political ideas gained rapid acceptance.
Virtual Currencies In India Journey So Far
Bitcoin has been the talk of the market yet has the government report closed the doors to its development.
Applicability Of GDPR On Goods And Services Offered Over The Websites Outside The European Union
Applicability of the EU data Protection laws outside its territory and provision for its intl. avoidance
