Finalization of draft rules governing the new GST regime alone will be able to determine whether these are an added “boon or bane” for assessees.
This article highlights certain key compliance aspects under the new regime. Whether these are an added “boon or bane” for an assessee will be clear only in the coming months.
Registration
The journey of a taxpayer under the GST regime commences from registration under the applicable legislation. The “one India, one tax” manifesto has also been extended to the registration module, where an assessee does not need to go about knocking the doors of multiple tax authorities every time he/she is required to register himself/ herself under a different indirect tax regime. However, the manifesto in the context of registration is slightly tweaked to “one state, one tax.” This is because as on date, the centralized registration mechanism does not find a mention under the legislation, regardless of collective representations made by several service sectors such as telecom, information technology, and banking. With this, assessees have inherited an additional burden of obtaining registration for each state where they have a presence.
Every supplier will be liable for registration under the GST regime in the state from where he/she makes a taxable supply of goods and/or services if his/her aggregate turnover in a financial year exceeds INR 20 lakhs. In case of supplies from special-category states, the threshold limit is capped at INR 10 lakhs. With the term “supply” covering all forms of supply of goods or services or both and “aggregate turnover” covering all taxable supplies, exempt supplies, exports, and interstate supplies, it appears that there would be very few assessees who would not be required to opt for registration under the new regime.
ãã®èšäºã¯ LegalEra ã® May 2017 çã«æ²èŒãããŠããŸãã
7 æ¥éã® Magzter GOLD ç¡æãã©ã€ã¢ã«ãéå§ããŠãäœåãã®å³éžããããã¬ãã¢ã ã¹ããŒãªãŒã9,000 以äžã®éèªãæ°èã«ã¢ã¯ã»ã¹ããŠãã ããã
ãã§ã«è³Œèªè ã§ã ?  ãµã€ã³ã€ã³
ãã®èšäºã¯ LegalEra ã® May 2017 çã«æ²èŒãããŠããŸãã
7 æ¥éã® Magzter GOLD ç¡æãã©ã€ã¢ã«ãéå§ããŠãäœåãã®å³éžããããã¬ãã¢ã ã¹ããŒãªãŒã9,000 以äžã®éèªãæ°èã«ã¢ã¯ã»ã¹ããŠãã ããã
ãã§ã«è³Œèªè ã§ã? ãµã€ã³ã€ã³
If You Think Positive Covid Is A Big Opportunity
Senior Vice President and Head of Legal, ESSAR CAPITAL, Badrinath Durvasula, holds forth on his professional journey, the essence of leadership, working from home, books and moreâŠ
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT
JOINT VENTURE TRANSACTIONS
NEW ARBITRATION RULES
PUBLISHED BY THE LONDON COURT OF INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION (LCIA) AND INTERNATIONAL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE (ICC)
M&A in the time of COVID and beyond
What is clear for those engaging in cross-border M&A is that countries around the world are becoming increasingly protective of their economies and industries, with new rules being introduced and existing rules being more widely applied
SWITZERLAND A DIFFERENTIATED APPROACH TO FRAUD
Swiss law interprets the offense of fraud in a special way where in addition to the characteristics of deception and damage as known in many jurisdictions, a qualified lie, i.e. a malicious approach, is required
JOINT VENTURE DISPUTES MEDIATING
Mediation has shown itself to be a powerful tool for bringing a speedy and effective end to crossborder disputes while preserving the commercial relationship between them.
Recognition of HONG KONG INSOLVENCY PROCEEDINGS IN MAINLAND CHINA
A TEST CASE IN THE MAKING?
CONFIDENTIALITY IN ARBITRATION: RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN SINGAPORE
Two recent developments in Singapore case law and legislation reflect a willingness to preserve confidentiality related obligations in all arbitrations
ESSENTIAL GOODS SERVICES UNDER IBC
WHAT DOES IT ESSENTIALLY MEAN?
A BIDEN ADMINISTRATION'S NEW VISION FOR THE AMERICAN WORKPLACE
A LOOK AT THE KEY CHANGES PRESIDENT-ELECT BIDEN IS LIKELY TO MAKE ONCE HE TAKES OFFICE